Cantor claims Obamacare provides IRS access to individual wellness records
During a latest floor debate, Home Majority Leader Eric Cantor warned of dire consequences within the IRS implementing portions of Obamacare plus collecting taxes to aid pay for the healthcare reforms. "The IRS may have access to the American people's …
Read more about PolitiFact
Health care spending projections for the upcoming decade, published inside the diary Health Affairs last week, appeared to have a small anything for everyone. Prepared by Medicare’s Office of the Actuary, the report notes which healthcare spending can heighten 0.2 % quicker than earlier projected due to the wellness reform law’s countless changes to the program. As a outcome, The NY Times proclaimed which the “wellness program won’t fuel big spending,” causing an yearly spending heighten of 6.3 % instead of 6.1 %. The Christian Science Monitor, found on the alternative hand, warned which reform may certainly result wellness insurance fees to rise plus which Americans ought to be about protect for big increases inside 2014 whenever most law’s main provisions kick inside. Spending about wellness insurance is expected to grow 12.8 % inside 2014 because millions of uninsured Americans gain coverage. But 1 interprets the results of the report, it’s obvious which increasing healthcare bills stay unfinished company.
ARIZONA: The Senate has established an Ad-Hoc Committee found on the Impacts of Health Care Reform Implementation. The Committee can hold its initial meeting later this month. The preliminary schedule includes: Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (Medicaid) requirements; insurance reforms; impacts about healthcare providers; plus taxes implications. Members furnished to the committee include AHIP retained counsel, scientific plus company representatives, plus representatives of the Goldwater Institute, a traditional think tank.
COLORADO: The Division of Insurance (DOI) has used for a $ 1 million wellness insurance exchange grant. If granted, the funds is employed for analysis plus developing recommendations for implementation of a exchange.
Specific regions revealed include modeling about adverse selection, value options, improving actuarial staff plus determining the actuarial effects of benefit packages in an exchange plus inside the exterior regulated marketplace. The Department of Regulatory Agencies finalized 3 laws which define the standardized electronic identification plus communications systems to be utilized by all wellness plans running inside Colorado. The laws are the happen of 2008 legislation requiring carriers to employ systems qualified by the Committee about Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE). Carriers need to be capable to demonstrate their conformity by Sept. 1, 2014.
DELAWARE: The Department of Insurance (DOI) has issued a bulletin regarding newly enacted legislation which prohibits rescissions based about healthcare claims underwriting. The legislation finalized into law by Governor Markell about August 30th prohibits rescission, cancellation, or limitation when an enrollee is covered, except inside instances of scam or intentional misrepresentation of the information truth. Effective Sept. 23, 2014, before approval by the Commissioner or her designee is needed before a wellness insurer can rescind, cancel or limit existing coverage based about created wellness or health info.
LOUISIANA: The DOI has used for a grant connected to wellness insurance exchanges. Aetna, together with the Louisiana Association of Health Plans, may engage inside a meeting with all the DOI to discuss the grant plus additional issues associated to healthcare reform.
NEW JERSEY: The Department of Banking & Insurance (DOBI) last week issued a bulletin providing template contract riders which insurance carriers may use for the big group marketplace as well as the (non-reform) individual plus little boss markets to describe changes to comply with all the Patient Protection plus Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The rider templates, that can be selected by carriers without submission to DOBI for formal review or approval, address the following wellness benefit program requirements: Extension of coverage to dependents; yearly plus life dollar limits; first-dollar coverage of preventive services; restrictions about preexisting condition exclusions; plus rescissions. A carrier not utilizing the rider template should submit their own types for DOBI’s formal review plus filing, or approval to bring benefit plans into conformity by September 23, 2014.
OKLAHOMA: DOI Commissioner Kim Holland plus staff hosted an informational stakeholder meeting last week to discuss the DOI’s plans for creation plus implementation of Oklahoma’s exchange below the PPACA. DOI intends to utilize issue-specific functioning groups to manage the task going forward. The state’s online Medicaid registration procedure went live September 7 plus processed over 2,000 applications with a 60 % approval rate the initially 28 hours. Over 400 apps came from hospitals which offered overwhelmingly positive suggestions. This internet tool was referenced because a potential “beginning point” of the exchange’s eventual infrastructure. The DOI submitted an application for a $ 1 million Exchange Planning Grant inside August plus expects to hear a choice from HHS by the finish of the month. If granted, the cash is chosen, inside piece, to hire a consultant to aid with an RFP to hire a provider to aid build the exchange. Other subjects of conversation focused found on the more technical plus difficult aspects of building an exchange, including coordinating billing/payment by companies, collecting plus reporting information about those entitled to taxes or premium credits plus expense sharing subsidies, allowing/finding/identifying navigators to aid customers, plus choosing when any extra state benefits/mandates will be included inside coverage. Aetna usually remain active inside this procedure by serving about future workgroups whenever appropriate.
WYOMING: The DOI has submitted its program for a wellness insurance exchange grant to the federal government. The DOI might utilize $ 800,000 to fund a research, to be overseen with a Governor’s task force, of the feasibility of 3 exchange choices. The choices include (1) running a Wyoming state exchange, (2) participating inside a territorial exchange, or (3) permitting HHS to run the exchange. This research might happen inside 2 phases: stage 1 might aid educate task force members plus consult with stakeholders plus specialists about working an exchange inside the state; stage 2 might include implementing the recommendations of the task force when it’s decided which Wyoming must engage inside the surgery of a exchange. DOI has indicated which no legislative action is essential to carry out the tasks of the grant, except the state chooses to follow the surgery of a exchange. The white paper moreover outlines which many key governmental agencies may engage inside the efforts, that will be facilitated by the University of Wyoming.
Roberts comments plus ACA Impact. If you don’t purchase insurance, you need to pay more inside taxes (inside the shape of the penalty)
Section 125 (IRS code). If you don’t purchase insurance, you need to pay more inside taxes. This has been a focal point of the taxes regulations for at minimum 25 years (maybe longer). Note which 125 regulations go beyond wellness insurance into dental plus additional synonymous IRS laws extend into existence insurance, plus spending accounts.
In both instances, individuals that don’t purchase wellness insurance pay more inside taxes.
Answer by Sally
many the persons here are thus misinformed I don’t bother answering thier dumb charges cause they are dolts…
the truth is the massive most may keep the insurance they absolutely have plus can have greater choices i whenever the insurance exchanges are created.
it’s the aged adage, you are able to lead a horse to water however, we can”t create him drink…..
Answer by iris054
Republicans ought to be thanking Roberts. Why do we think John Roberts ruled because he did? It had been a smart, calculated move.
1)Had Roberts ruled inside favor of the Republicans, it might have energized the Democrats appropriate before an election. Instead, his ruling energized the Republicans.
2)By clearly denoting the fine because a “tax” rather of the commerce clause matter within the bench, Roberts opened an avenue for the Republicans to be capable to overturn it. Just a easy most is required inside Congress to change taxes. Revenue bills can not be filibustered.
Remember, Republicans are the pawns of Wall Street, thus how do the insurance providers feel regarding Obamacare? They don’t mind the pre-existing thing plus caps deal plus all of the alternative small provisions, because lengthy because they receive 20 million unique customers’ costs to offset the losses. What they don’t like is the fact that inside 4 years the states will kick them out plus substitute them with single payer. That is the death of their industry as well as understand it.
Health care spending projections for the next decade, published in the journal Health Affairs last week, appeared to have a little something for everyone. Prepared by Medicare’s Office of the Actuary, the report notes that health care spending will increase 0.2 percent faster than previously projected due to the health reform law’s many changes to the system. As a result, The New York Times proclaimed that the “health plan won’t fuel big spending,” causing an annual spending increase of 6.3 percent rather than 6.1 percent. The Christian Science Monitor, on the other hand, warned that reform will definitely cause health insurance costs to rise and that Americans should be on guard for big increases in 2014 when many of the law’s major provisions kick in. Spending on health insurance is expected to increase 12.8 percent in 2014 as millions of uninsured Americans gain coverage. However one interprets the results of the report, it is clear that rising health care costs remain unfinished business.
ARIZONA: The Senate has established an Ad-Hoc Committee on the Impacts of Health Care Reform Implementation. The Committee will hold its initial meeting later this month. The preliminary agenda includes: Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (Medicaid) requirements; insurance reforms; impacts on health care providers; and tax implications. Members appointed to the committee include AHIP retained counsel, clinical and employer representatives, and representatives of the Goldwater Institute, a conservative think tank.
COLORADO: The Division of Insurance (DOI) has applied for a $ 1 million health insurance exchange grant. If awarded, the funds will be used for research and developing recommendations for implementation of an exchange.
Specific areas mentioned include modeling on adverse selection, value choices, increasing actuarial staff and determining the actuarial effects of benefit packages within an exchange and in the external regulated market. The Department of Regulatory Agencies finalized three regulations that define the standardized electronic identification and communications systems to be used by all health plans operating in Colorado. The regulations are the result of 2008 legislation requiring carriers to use systems certified by the Committee on Operating Rules for Information Exchange (CORE). Carriers must be able to demonstrate their compliance by Sept. 1, 2014.
DELAWARE: The Department of Insurance (DOI) has issued a bulletin regarding recently enacted legislation that prohibits rescissions based on medical claims underwriting. The legislation signed into law by Governor Markell on August 30th prohibits rescission, cancellation, or limitation once an enrollee is covered, except in cases of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of a material fact. Effective Sept. 23, 2014, prior approval by the Commissioner or her designee is required before a health insurer may rescind, cancel or limit existing coverage based on written health or medical information.
LOUISIANA: The DOI has applied for a grant related to health insurance exchanges. Aetna, along with the Louisiana Association of Health Plans, will participate in a meeting with the DOI to discuss the grant and other issues related to health care reform.
NEW JERSEY: The Department of Banking & Insurance (DOBI) last week issued a bulletin providing template contract riders that insurance carriers can use for the large group market and the (non-reform) individual and small employer markets to describe changes to comply with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The rider templates, which may be used by carriers without submission to DOBI for formal review or approval, address the following health benefit plan requirements: Extension of coverage to dependents; annual and lifetime dollar limits; first-dollar coverage of preventive services; limitations on preexisting condition exclusions; and rescissions. A carrier not using the rider template must submit their own forms for DOBI’s formal review and filing, or approval to bring benefit plans into compliance by September 23, 2014.
OKLAHOMA: DOI Commissioner Kim Holland and staff hosted an informational stakeholder meeting last week to discuss the DOI’s plans for creation and implementation of Oklahoma’s exchange under the PPACA. DOI intends to use issue-specific working groups to manage the task going forward. The state’s online Medicaid enrollment process went live September 7 and processed over 2,000 applications with a 60 percent approval rate the first 28 hours. Over 400 apps came from hospitals that provided overwhelmingly positive feedback. This web tool was referenced as a possible “starting point” of the exchange’s eventual infrastructure. The DOI submitted an application for a $ 1 million Exchange Planning Grant in August and expects to hear a decision from HHS by the end of this month. If awarded, the money will be used, in part, to hire a consultant to assist with an RFP to hire a vendor to help build the exchange. Other topics of conversation focused on the more technical and difficult aspects of building an exchange, such as coordinating billing/payment through employers, collecting and reporting data on those entitled to tax or premium credits and cost sharing subsidies, allowing/finding/identifying navigators to assist consumers, and deciding if any additional state benefits/mandates would be included in coverage. Aetna will stay active in this process by serving on future workgroups when appropriate.
WYOMING: The DOI has submitted its plan for a health insurance exchange grant to the federal government. The DOI will use $ 800,000 to fund a study, to be overseen by a Governor’s task force, of the feasibility of three exchange options. The options include (1) operating a Wyoming state exchange, (2) participating in a regional exchange, or (3) allowing HHS to run the exchange. This study would occur in two phases: phase one would help educate task force members and consult with stakeholders and experts on operating an exchange in the state; phase two would include implementing the recommendations of the task force if it is decided that Wyoming should participate in the operation of an exchange. DOI has indicated that no legislative action is necessary to carry out the duties of the grant, unless the state decides to pursue the operation of an exchange. The white paper also outlines that several key governmental agencies will participate in the efforts, which will be facilitated by the University of Wyoming.
An article in the Thanksgiving edition of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution shows the myriad inconsistencies and irrationalities of the new health insurance overhaul law — dubbed “health care reform” — and spells out how the federal government is paving the way for the demise of the health insurance broker. Easy To Insure ME has the answers
Some incredible excerpts taken directly from the story, and my highly insightful comments:
“The process of creating this new way to shop for health insurance will be costly and enormously complicated.” — Duh, they want to reinvent the wheel…of course it’s going to be expensive and cumbersome! Imagine, if you will, the federal government requiring the states to come up with a plan to create a new distribution system for consumers to buy food products, even though we already have a system called “the grocery store.” A daunting task? You bet! And frankly, not necessary.
“States that take on the task of running an exchange will have a significant amount of discretion that will determine the level of competition, the amount of choices for consumers and ultimately whether market forces work to help control insurance costs, as the law intends.” — So, the Obama Administration and Congress believe that the states should control competition among privately owned businesses, and also allow them to determine whether or not to allow the market to control costs. Yeah, show me any state or federal agency that allows the American public to determine how much taxes are taken and what is spent by the government, and I will show you a pit bull that prefers bon bons over raw meat. The states will determine whether or not the market should dictate costs? Which way do you think they will go with that…set the costs themselves, or allow the market to do it?
“Anybody who shops on the Web today for products where they can go up there and put in preferences and pull up a set of choices that are relevant to those preferences, for a hotel or an airline or whatever, that is the vision of the exchange for health care,” said Joel Ario, director of the Office of Health Insurance Exchanges at the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. — OK, if that isn’t seen as an overt indication that the Obama Administration and its operatives consider the broker to be completely irrelevant in the health insurance distribution process, then I don’t know what does. It is reminiscent of earlier this year, when a staff blogger at USA Today wrote that the health exchange system originally proposed by the House would imitate Travelocity, since the fed would control the entire thing, which the Senate version (closer to what we now have) would allow the states to manage it. It appears, however, that Mr. Ario, a onetime Pennsylvania insurance commissioner who worked directly with carriers and brokers, has swallowed the Kool-Aid and seems to think that providing health care coverage is as easy as reserving a room at Motel 6.
“Most employees of large companies should expect to continue to get their coverage at work, experts said. But some small and medium-size employers could end up dropping their coverage and shifting their workers to the exchange. How many companies might do that is a big unknown.” — speaking as an experienced journalist who seeks to back up blanket statements with facts, I have to say that this is one of the most irresponsible and egregious acts of unprofessional journalism I have seen in recent memory, and also one of the biggest misconceptions if not outright lies proffered by those in favor of state-run health insurance. What facts does the writer use to back up her assertion that “most employees of large companies” will continue with employer-sponsored coverage? Did she quote any employers, to at least show anecdotally that employers will keep employees covered? Or is she relying simply on unnamed “experts,” whose affiliations are conveniently omitted from the story? And “some” small and mid-size companies could put workers on the exchange? Is this again from the “experts?” Or is this complete conjecture? It appears to be. At least the writer is being upfront when she states that it is a “big unknown,” but making such concrete statements such as “most” and “some” and then admitting that it is really unknown, is poor form. In reality, we might see a majority of American workers form both large and small firms pushed onto the exchanges, where they will not only have to find their own insurance (required by law), but pay for it out of their own pockets, at rates that will likely be higher than what the employer was paying in the first place. Nice.
“The way the law is written, some employers will be penalized for failing to offer coverage. But paying the penalty might be more cost-effective than providing the coverage.” — Strike the word “might” and replace it with “will,” and this statement will be accurate. Employers will drop coverage and the employees will be forced to go onto the exchange. And brokers are out of that mix entirely.
Georgia’s governor, governor-elect and attorney general are all against the federal law and trying to thwart it, but are working within the law to ensure that at the state level, at least, it matches to the best of their ability a free market exchange.
Without getting into a big Constitutional question (which, actually, is at the heart of the lawsuits instituted by the states against the law), it is incredible that the top elected officials of our country would enact legislation to force states to do something that they neither want to do nor have the resources to do, and take what some say is a disjointed system of state-based insurance regulation, and turn it into a black hole of regulation and uncertainties that could prove disastrous.
Right now, the broker community is the navigator holding the compass and telescope on the ship, “USS Purchasing Health Insurance.” The federal government has decided that it can do a better job for the crew and passengers, and is putting the broker on a life raft and pushing it out to sea, while telling the passengers that the ride will now be smoother and easier.
The only thing that is missing is Gilligan and the Skipper.